Grievance Handling

Effective grievance handling is the cornerstone of a harmonious and productive workplace. By addressing employee concerns promptly and fairly, organisations foster trust, enhance morale, and reduce the risk of conflict escalating into formal disputes or tribunal claims. The financial and reputational costs of mishandled grievances – lost productivity, legal fees, and potential compensation – underscore the importance of robust procedures.

Under UK employment law, employers have a statutory obligation to provide clear, transparent grievance processes. The Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures articulates best practice principles; adherence to its guidelines can significantly mitigate tribunal penalties. Hopkins Solicitors specialises in employment law, offering bespoke advice to help employers and HR professionals navigate both routine and complex grievances, from initial notification through to appeals and post-resolution monitoring.

Understanding Grievances in the Workplace

Types of Grievances

A grievance occurs when an employee raises a concern about their work, working conditions, or treatment by colleagues or managers. Identifying the nature of the grievance is critical to determining the appropriate resolution pathway. Grievances generally fall into two categories:

• Informal Grievances: Low-level issues that can often be resolved through conversation. These include minor miscommunications, adjustments to work schedules, or clarifications around job roles. For example, if an employee feels overwhelmed by a sudden surge in workload, an informal discussion can realign expectations before stress builds.
• Formal Grievances: Serious or unresolved matters that necessitate written complaints and structured procedures. Examples include allegations of discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, significant pay discrepancies that breach the Equal Pay Act 1970, or breaches of health and safety obligations under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Formal grievances ensure procedural fairness, with clear record-keeping at each stage.

Common Examples of Grievances:

• Pay and Benefits Disputes: Claims of underpayment, unfair bonus allocations, or unequal pay for employees performing the same role.
• Discrimination and Harassment: Unwanted conduct related to age, sex, race, disability, religion, or other protected characteristics.
• Workload and Resource Concerns: Excessive workloads, unrealistic targets, or lack of necessary tools or support.
• Working Hours and Flexibility: Disputes over shift patterns, refusal of flexible working requests, or unacknowledged overtime.
• Health, Safety, and Wellbeing: Complaints about unsafe conditions, lack of mental health support, or workplace bullying.

Legal Framework

The legal landscape for grievance handling is grounded in statute and best practice guidance:

• Acas Code of Practice: While not legally binding, employment tribunals consider compliance with the Code when assessing claims. Failure to follow the Code’s core principles, such as timely investigation and fair hearings, can lead to up to a 25% uplift in awarded compensation. Key sections include:
  • 60–65: Principles of good grievance handling (e.g., impartiality, reasonable timeframes).
  • 66–71: Stages of a formal grievance procedure.
• Employment Rights Act 1996: Establishes rights around unfair dismissal and sets out obligations for fair disciplinary and grievance processes. Tribunals examine whether an employer acted reasonably in handling an employee’s grievance as part of any dismissal claim.
• Equality Act 2010: Prohibits discrimination and harassment. If an employer fails to address a discrimination grievance properly, this can constitute evidence of unlawful discrimination, leading to substantial awards for injury to feelings and aggravated damages.
• Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974: Requires employers to provide a safe working environment. Persistent failure to address safety-related grievances can attract enforcement action from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and give rise to personal injury claims.

Maintaining a documented grievance policy in line with these frameworks not only demonstrates legal compliance but also signals to employees that their concerns will be taken seriously.

Steps in Handling Grievances

Informal Resolution 

Informal resolution aims to defuse conflicts at an early stage, saving time and resources. Successful informal handling relies on:

• Managerial Competence: Line managers should be trained to recognise early signs of discontent – changes in performance, increased absenteeism, or overt expressions of dissatisfaction.
• Open Dialogue: Establish regular one-to-one meetings, where employees can discuss concerns without the formality of a grievance. Use active listening techniques, summarising what has been said, asking clarifying questions, and demonstrating empathy.
• Mediation and Coaching: If conflict arises between team members, consider internal or external mediation. A trained mediator can facilitate constructive conversations, helping parties to understand each other’s perspectives and agree on practical solutions.
• Documenting Informal Actions: Maintain concise, confidential records of informal meetings, agreed actions, and review dates. This creates an audit trail and prevents confusion if the issue escalates.

By encouraging prompt, informal discussions, employers often resolve issues before invoking formal processes, preserving relationships and minimising disruption.

Formal Grievance Procedure

When informal measures fail or the grievance is inherently serious, a structured formal process ensures fairness, transparency, and legal compliance. The five core stages are:

1. Receipt of Written Grievance:
   • Employees submit a detailed grievance letter, outlining the nature of the complaint, dates, times, affected individuals, and desired remediation. Employers should acknowledge receipt in writing within three working days.
   • Use a standard template to ensure all necessary information is captured.
2. Appointment of an Investigator:
   • Select an impartial investigator – ideally someone not involved in the events or line management of the complainant or respondent. In small businesses, an external consultant may be appointed.
   • Define the scope of the investigation, specifying key issues to explore.
3. Investigation Process:
   • Interview the complainant, respondent, and witnesses separately, ensuring each party has the opportunity to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative under the Employment Relations Act 1999.
   • Review documentary evidence: emails, performance records, CCTV footage, and health and safety reports, as relevant.
   • Maintain neutral, factual records – avoid recording opinions in the investigation file.
4. Grievance Meeting:
   • Convene a meeting chaired by a suitably trained manager or HR professional. Provide at least five working days’ notice, a copy of the investigation report, and any witness statements to all attendees.
   • Reinforce the employee’s right to be accompanied and clarify the meeting’s purpose: to discuss findings and determine an outcome.
   • Chair the meeting impartially, allowing both sides to present evidence, ask questions, and clarify points.
5. Decision and Written Outcome:
   • Within ten working days of the meeting, issue a written decision. The letter should:
     • Summarise the complaint and investigation process.
     • State whether the grievance is upheld, partially upheld, or dismissed, with rationale.
     • Outline any corrective actions (e.g., training, mediation, disciplinary measures).
     • Advise the employee of their right to appeal and the timeframe for doing so (typically five working days).

5. Appeal Process:

• Appeals should be heard by a more senior manager or an appeals panel not previously involved. Use similar procedural safeguards: written appeal submissions, meetings with accompaniment rights, thorough consideration, and written appeal outcomes within ten working days.
• Ensure the appeal decision is final, barring any exceptional circumstances (e.g., evidence of bias or new information).

Post-Grievance Actions

A robust post-grievance strategy consolidates resolution and prevents recurrence:

• Implement Agreed Remedies Promptly: Whether it’s a change in reporting lines, adjustment to working hours, or targeted training, take visible action to demonstrate commitment.
• Follow-Up Meetings: Schedule check-ins at one month and three months post-resolution to assess whether the issue remains resolved and to address any residual tensions.
• Confidentiality and Non-Victimisation: Remind all parties of confidentiality obligations and reiterate that victimising or penalising the complainant or witnesses constitutes misconduct under the Equality Act 2010.
• Policy Review: If the grievance exposed gaps in existing policies, such as unclear reporting channels or ambiguous definitions of harassment, revise documentation and communicate updates to all staff.
• Record Retention: Securely retain all grievance files for at least six years, in line with limitation periods for tribunal claims.

Request a Callback

Best Practices for Employers and HR Professionals

Developing Clear Policies

An effective grievance policy is the foundation of every fair process. To develop robust policies:

• Draft with Legal Alignment: Base your policy on the latest Acas Code and relevant legislation. Include definitions, scope, escalation pathways, confidentiality assurances, and non-victimisation clauses.
• Use Plain Language: Avoid legal jargon. Employees should easily understand how to raise a grievance, expected timelines, and their rights (e.g., accompaniment, appeal).
• Accessibility: Publish the policy in multiple formats – digital (intranet, email), printed handbooks, and as part of new starter induction packs.
• Policy Champions: Identify HR or senior ambassadors who can advise employees on procedure and mediate informal discussions.

Management and Training:

• Manager Workshops: Conduct annual training on recognising grievance indicators, practising active listening, and managing informal interventions.
• Scenario-Based Exercises: Use role-plays to simulate grievance meetings, reinforcing procedural steps and empathy skills.
• Evaluation: Gather feedback post-training to refine content and identify emerging issues.

Fostering an Open Culture

A proactive culture reduces the incidence of formal grievances:

• Leadership Commitment: Senior leaders should regularly communicate the importance of raising concerns and demonstrate responsiveness to feedback.
• Regular Engagement Surveys: Conduct anonymous pulse surveys to identify areas of discontent before they formalise into grievances. Analyse trends by team, location, or demographic group.
• Town Hall Forums and Q&As: Provide platforms where employees can ask questions of senior executives in a safe, moderated environment.
• Suggestion and Recognition Schemes: Encourage staff to propose improvements and acknowledge those who help resolve workplace challenges.

Common Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Delays and Backlogs

Challenge: Inadequate resourcing leads to delayed investigations.

Solution: Establish SLA-driven timelines and allocate dedicated HR caseworkers. For peak periods or complex cases, engage external investigators to maintain impartiality and speed.

4.2 Impartiality Concerns

Challenge: Employees perceive bias if investigators report into respondents’ line functions.

Solution: Rotate investigators, use cross-functional panels, or retain third-party investigators for sensitive grievances.

4.3 Incomplete Documentation

Challenge: Key evidence or meeting notes are missing, undermining the defence of the process.

Solution: Institute mandatory use of digital casework tools with lockdown templates for each stage: grievance submission, investigation report, meeting minutes, and outcome letters.

Retaliation Risks

Challenge: Fear of victimisation deters employees from raising concerns, especially in smaller teams.

Solution: Strengthen non-victimisation training, ensure anonymous feedback channels (e.g., ethics hotline), and implement routine audits of post-grievance treatment.

Request a Callback

How Hopkins Solicitors Can Assist

Hopkins Solicitors brings deep expertise in employment law and HR consultancy to support organisations at every stage:

• Policy Drafting and Review: We analyse existing procedures against Acas and legislative requirements, recommending enhancements to close compliance gaps and streamline processes.
• Tailored Training Programmes: Our interactive workshops equip managers with practical skills in informal resolution, structured investigations, and conducting fair grievance meetings.
• Strategic Advisory and Case Support: We advise on complex grievances involving discrimination, whistleblowing, or collective disputes, advising on risk mitigation and representing clients in ACAS conciliations and tribunals.
• Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Our accredited mediators help restore working relationships swiftly, often preventing the need for formal grievance escalation.

With a client-centric approach and a proven track record, Hopkins Solicitors ensures organisations handle grievances effectively, maintain legal compliance, and cultivate positive employee relations.

Conclusion

Grievance handling is both a legal obligation and an opportunity to reinforce trust and engagement. By implementing clear policies, fostering open communication, and following structured procedures, UK employers can resolve disputes fairly, minimise legal exposure, and nurture a supportive workplace culture. For expert guidance tailored to your organisation’s needs, consult Hopkins Solicitors – your partner in effective grievance resolution.

Request a Callback