Unfair Dismissal Tribunal

Unfair dismissal is one of the most significant employment law protections in the UK, ensuring that employees cannot be summarily removed from their roles without a fair reason or without the employer following a fair procedure. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), employees enjoy the right not to be unfairly dismissed, protecting them against arbitrary or discriminatory termination. For employers, adherence to these statutory requirements is paramount, as breach can lead to costly tribunal awards, damage to reputation, and operational disruption.

Employment tribunals provide a structured forum where disputes over dismissal are resolved. Before lodging a claim, mandatory Acas Early Conciliation seeks to facilitate settlement through negotiation, reflecting the UK’s preference for alternative dispute resolution. Hopkins Solicitors brings extensive expertise in guiding both employees and employers through each stage of the unfair dismissal process: from pre-claim advice and conciliation to tribunal hearings and appeals, ensuring strategic, compliant, and cost-effective outcomes.

Understanding Unfair Dismissal

What Constitutes Unfair Dismissal?

Under section 98 of the ERA 1996, an unfair dismissal arises where an employee is dismissed “without sufficient reason” or where the employer fails to act in a procedurally fair manner. Jurisprudence has refined these tests into:

• Substantive Fairness: The employer’s reason for dismissal must be one of the five potentially fair reasons listed in section 98(1): capability or qualifications, conduct, redundancy, statutory illegality, or Some Other Substantial Reason (SOSR). Case law (e.g., Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones [1983] and Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1988]) confirms that even substantively fair dismissals can be unfair procedurally.
• Procedural Fairness: Employers must follow a fair procedure tailored to the circumstances, as set out in the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. Failure to comply can result in an uplift of up to 25% on compensation awards.

Examples of Potentially Fair vs. Unfair Dismissals:

• Capability: Dismissing a teacher who fails to meet performance targets after documented performance improvement plans and additional training is likely fair. Conversely, dismissing without any performance review or opportunity to improve is unfair.
• Conduct: A warehouse worker caught on CCTV stealing inventory can be fairly dismissed for gross misconduct if a proper investigation was conducted. However, dismissing based solely on unverified rumours, without interviewing the employee or witnesses, is unfair.
• SOSR: Genuine business decisions, such as closing a site, may justify dismissal under SOSR, provided the employer consults affected staff and explores alternatives (redeployment, retraining).

Employee Eligibility and Time Limits

Not all employees can bring an unfair dismissal claim. Eligibility depends on:

• Minimum Service: Generally, employees need 24 months’ continuous service by the effective date of termination. However, there are no qualifying periods for automatically unfair reasons like whistleblowing, health and safety activity, or discrimination-related dismissals under the Equality Act 2010.
• Employment Status: Only ‘employees’ (with a contract of service) can claim, excluding most self-employed contractors. Tribunals apply multi-factor tests (control, mutuality of obligation, personal service) to determine status.
• Time Limits: An ET1 claim must be filed within three months less one day of termination. Acas Early Conciliation must be notified before submitting the ET1; a certificate of conciliation (ACAS 1) extends the tribunal deadline to one month from the certificate date.

Missing these deadlines risks automatic rejection by the tribunal. Early legal advice helps safeguard entitlement to bring a claim and ensures preservation of crucial evidence, such as dismissal letters, contract terms, and contemporaneous notes of meetings.

The Employment Tribunal Process

Initiating a Claim and Acas Early Conciliation

Acas Early Conciliation is mandatory for most employment disputes. Key steps include:

1. Notification: The prospective claimant submits an EC1 form via Acas or online, outlining the dispute.
2. Conciliation Period: Acas conciliators engage both parties for up to one month (extendable by 14 days) to negotiate a settlement, discussing potential compensation or reinstatement without tribunal involvement.
3. Conciliation Certificate: If no settlement is reached, Acas issues a certificate, allowing the claim to proceed.

Following conciliation, the claimant completes an ET1 form, structured to capture:

• Employment Details: Dates, role, remuneration, contractual terms (notice period, disciplinary procedures).
• Factual Background: Chronology of events, meetings, warnings, and dismissal rationale.
• Legal Grounds: Reference to ERA 1996 sections, Acas Code breaches, or relevant Equality Act 2010 provisions.
• Remedies Sought: Reinstatement, re-engagement, basic and compensatory awards.

The tribunal registry serves the ET1 on the respondent, who must file an ET3 response within 28 days, outlining facts and legal defences and providing a list of documents. Tribunal directions will govern disclosure of further evidence, witness statements, and a case management timetable leading to the hearing.

The Tribunal Hearing

Employment tribunal hearings vary in length, from a half-day in straightforward cases to multi-day hearings in complex disputes. Typical structure:

• Preliminary Issues: The tribunal may address jurisdiction or strike-out applications (e.g., time-barred claims).
• Opening Statements: Each side outlines their case and legal issues.
• Evidence and Cross-Examination:
  • Claimant’s Case: The claimant gives evidence, supported by witnesses (e.g., colleagues, experts on workplace practice). Cross-examination tests credibility and reliability.
  • Respondent’s Case: The employer calls witnesses (managers, HR personnel) and may rely on expert evidence (occupational psychologists, industry standards).
• Legal Submissions: Counsel or solicitor-advocates refer to statutory tests, Acas Code provisions, and relevant case law.
• Closing Arguments: Each side summarises why the dismissal was fair/unfair and addresses any tribunal questions.

After deliberation, the tribunal issues a Judgment either orally at the hearing’s conclusion or in writing later. The Reasons for the Decision document sets out factual findings, legal analysis, and remedy calculations.

Remedies and Compensation

Reinstatement vs. Re-engagement:

• Reinstatement: The employee returns to the same role with continuity of service. Rarely ordered due to potential workplace tension.
• Re-engagement: A suitable alternative role is offered. Ordered where relationships are salvageable, but returning to the original position is impractical.

Compensation Awards:

• Basic Award: Calculated akin to redundancy pay: one week’s pay per year of service (up to 20 years), subject to a statutory cap on weekly pay (£571 from April 2025).
• Compensatory Award: Covers actual and future financial loss, including lost wages, pension contributions, and job search expenses. Normally capped at 52 weeks’ pay (capped at £29,692 in 2025), but unlimited where dismissal breaches Equality Act protected rights.

Adjustment Factors:

• Polkey Reduction: Reduction if dismissal would have occurred even with a fair procedure.
• Failure to Mitigate: Reduction where the claimant did not reasonably seek alternative employment.
• Contributory Conduct: Deduction up to 50% for claimant misconduct contributing to dismissal.

Request a Callback

Employer Guidance: Preventing and Managing Unfair Dismissal Claims

Implementing Fair Dismissal Procedures

Compliance with the Acas Code ensures both procedural fairness and a defence to claims:

• Clear Written Policies: Disciplinary, capability, redundancy, and grievance procedures, reviewed annually and included in the employee handbook.
• Training for Managers: Regular workshops on conducting investigations, hearings, and appeals in line with the Acas Code and ERA 1996.
• Investigation Protocols:
  • Appoint trained, impartial investigators.
  • Prepare detailed investigation plans, witness interview scripts, and factual reports.
• Formal Hearings:
  • Issue allegations in writing with sufficient detail.
  • Provide reasonable notice (minimum 3 working days) and right to accompaniment under ERA 1996.
  • Record minutes and allow adjournments for further evidence.
• Appeals Mechanism:
  • Offer a structured appeal hearing before a more senior manager.
  • Document the appeal decision with reasons and ensure it is final.

Responding to Claims Effectively

When faced with an unfair dismissal claim, employers should take decisive steps:

• Immediate Acas Engagement: Continue conciliation discussions in good faith to explore a settlement.
• Evidence Collation: Gather all contemporaneous records – emails, meeting notes, performance data, and disciplinary warnings, and ensure consistency in rationale.
• Legal Counsel: Instruct employment solicitors early to draft robust ET3 responses, identify weak points, and prepare witness bundles.
• ADR Options:
  • Mediation: Engaging an independent mediator to facilitate a negotiated resolution.
  • Settlement Agreements: Confidentially resolving the dispute with agreed compensation and waiver of future claims.

A well-prepared and documented defence often persuades claimants to settle early, reducing tribunal costs and preserving confidentiality.

How Hopkins Solicitors Can Assist

Hopkins Solicitors provides end-to-end unfair dismissal solutions:

• Pre-Dismissal Audits: Reviewing proposed dismissals for substantive and procedural fairness to prevent claims before they arise.
• Policy Drafting and Compliance: Creating and updating disciplinary and dismissal procedures aligned with the Acas Code and ERA 1996.
• Training and Workshops: Delivering bespoke sessions for HR teams and line managers on fair conduct of dismissals, investigations, and appeals.
• Tribunal Representation: Advocating at hearings with seasoned solicitor-advocates, presenting compelling legal and factual arguments, and negotiating favourable outcomes.

Whether acting for employees or employers, our jargon-free advice and strategic approach ensure that your interests are effectively represented.

Conclusion

Unfair dismissal law plays a pivotal role in maintaining a balanced and fair workplace, ensuring that employers can manage their workforce in line with business needs while safeguarding employees from arbitrary or discriminatory termination. By mastering both substantive and procedural fairness tests – grounded in the Employment Rights Act 1996 and refined through key case law – employers can implement dismissal processes that withstand scrutiny, reducing the likelihood of tribunal challenges and financial liabilities. Equally, employees benefit from clear avenues to contest unfair termination, backed by the protective framework of Acas Early Conciliation and robust tribunal procedures.

In an environment where workplace dynamics and regulations continually evolve, proactive engagement with dismissal protocols is essential. Employers who invest in regular policy reviews, manager training, and early dispute resolution not only fortify their legal defences but also demonstrate a commitment to equitable treatment and organisational integrity. Meanwhile, employees who seek timely legal advice and leverage Acas support can navigate dismissal disputes more effectively, often achieving favourable settlements or tribunal outcomes. Hopkins Solicitors remains dedicated to guiding both sides through these complexities – providing strategic counsel, tailored training, and vigorous representation to help you achieve fair, compliant, and lasting resolutions.

Request a Callback